I have been following the Diana inquest quite closely here in the UK, and what I have been curious about, is the absolute hysteria (for want of a better word) about whether Diana was pregnant or not.  It seems absurd that a whole nation is determined to find out this piece of extremely personal information.  I wondered why this fixation, what on earth were people banging on about, and what made them so convinced she was pregnant.

So I opened up starlight and clicked on the button marked parapegma (which is a very smart word for a table of rising and setting stars) and watched the sequence of stars that were rising and setting while she and Dodi were having their holiday and in the weeks from the first week in July, which would have made her approx 6-10 weeks pregnant at the time of the accident.  If she had been further along, it would have become public knowledge, as she would have had to have had a scan, and would have cut her holiday short.  I want to state for the record, that I personally do not believe that she was pregnant, but I now totally understand why a lot of people really believe she was.

For those of you who attended the conference and in particular my lecture, you might remember how I stressed the heliacal rising and setting of Sadalmelek and Sadalsuud as fertile stars in event charts.  These stars are found in the stars of Aquarius,  on each shoulder of the sky God, as he pours fertile water from his urn.  When one or both of these stars is linked in parans or is found on the angles ,or is the heliacal rising or setting star, then that location is sensitive to babies and issues of fertility.  I like to think of it as a “place where babies are” when these stars are walking with us on the cross of matter.  I also use Sirius in my fertility work – being the forerunner of IVF (Isis sews his genitalia back together in order to conceive) and there are other stars such as Alphecca, Acubens, Alkes etc that in a group, together in parans with significant planets can indicate fertile moments and locations in time and space.

In the parapegma (click on tools, click on parapegma, type in start date for Paris and do one for London - and voila!) you will notice that there are several risings and settings of fertile stars mentioned above around London and Paris at this time.  I used both London and Paris charts, since Diana was a member of a London based Royal family, but the incident happened in Paris.  Interesting thing is that since there are only 3 degrees difference in latitude between Paris and London several stars repeat over the two locations.  I was interested to see what the difference between the charts was, in the first place, and why the nation is so obsessed with the idea that Diana was pregnant at the time of the accident.

In the Paris chart, the Heliacal Rising star for the day of the crash is Phact, and the Heliacal Setting star is Sadalsuud.  Sadalsuud is also in parans with Uranus in the mundane chart of the accident.

Starlight’s interpretations for Sadalsuud as Heliacal Setting : a fortunate event, a lucky chance.

Starlight’s interpretation for Sadalmelek in parans with Uranus in the mundane chart: an optimistic outlook, the people believing in luck.

But Sadalsuud was also in parans with the Sun on that day, and the Sun was in the constellation of Leo, in the sign of Virgo tropically.

But getting back to the Parapegma, the In the time frame 1 July 1997 to 2 Sept 1997, the following stars rise and set for the location of Paris (and mostly for London too)

Sadalsuud, Sadalmelek, Alphecca, Sirius, Acubens – among others, but for me this indicates that Paris was in the centre of a huge stork party, and it seems the rest of the world knows that too, on  a deep unconscious level, where the whole collective understands that that particular time (July and August) is a good season for conceiving in Paris.  Since we have used constellations in the past for agricultural reasons, I would like to suggest that this knowledge(seasonal rising and settings of stars) is as much a part of our DNA as grandma’s red hair, and that when this event happened, the collective responded instinctively and intuitively and wanted to know about the child Diana might have been carrying.  In older times, where one did not have access to contraceptives, it is entirely likely, in my opinion ,that Diana would have been pregnant, she was afterall, spending intimate time with a  handsome man in Paris while a Stork convention was going on.

I urge the list to go and investigate the parapegma,  I have not listed all the parans and the absolutely gob-smacking unbelievable interpretations that accompany the rest of the charts – kudos to Ms B, and it would make an interesting conversation, especially in light of the fact that this inquest is current and an outcome will be published one day soon.

I would like to suggest that we look at the stars that accompanied Mercury (reporters and media) and see what stars were in parans and perhaps we can some clarity on the circumstances surrounding Diana’s death.

Chart details for her death: 31 August 1997 3.57am Paris, France. The first image that I put up is a lovely visual of a Princess (constellation of Virgo) with a diamond/wheat sheaf in her left hand/pocket!  If you have been following the inquest, you will know much has been made of the supposed engagement ring that was found in the left hand pocket of her jacket on admission to the hospital.  Notice that Mars/Nergal is still delighting with his Venus/Erishkigal, in the conjunction in the sky, but notice that Mars is directly in line with the Gates to the underworld or the other side…..It is as if he leads her there. (poetic license!)